Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '20 at 09:30
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 271
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 533
68% 516 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2277 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.5% Good
Lighting 80
Reflection 82.7
Parallax 80
65% 80.9 fps
MRender 80
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 77.1
63% 77 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 280 293 263 288 288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 483
Mixed 378
SusWrite 294
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 64.9
225% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 123%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
0GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 454 484 493 493 492 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 446
Mixed 403
SusWrite 465
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 54.6
198% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 126%
Great: 121%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 59 60 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 63.1
Write 63.9
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 60
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 51%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 79 79 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 74.6
Write 59.4
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 74.8
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.8% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 19
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback