PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 9020 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 9020 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20171227 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jun 25 '20 at 00:41 |
Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.7%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba MQ02ABF050H 500GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HDF01D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 61 27 52 42 MB/s
|
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
892GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 101 101 104 103 MB/s
|
72.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
52.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 3,485x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 2,235x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 1,859x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 3,568x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 714x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 686x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $178 |