Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG RF510/RF410/RF710
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '20 at 18:46
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	40% Below average	Memory 54.5 1-Core 59.1 2-Core 108 44% 73.7 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 150 20% 149 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C08E) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.86% Terrible	Lighting 3.27 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 1.31 3% 3.1 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 3.65 3% 4.06 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.86% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 102 49 50 50 49 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.9% Below average	Read 231 Write 225 Mixed 81 SusWrite 76.4 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 15 53% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 55.5 61% 105 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CF8 2x2GB 995 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.5 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RF510/RF410/RF710 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	30x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	26x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	55x
GeForce GT 420MNvidiaBench 2%, 1,922 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	2x
Extreme 240GBSanDisk $200Bench 76%, 7,034 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	15x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 80CE M471B5273CH0-CF8 6GBUnknownBench 28%, 29 samples	3x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16