Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '20 at 16:53
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$179
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 80.9
1-Core 153
2-Core 304
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 1,009
88% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,453
90% 1,453 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
62.5% Good
Lighting 79.2
Reflection 83.6
Parallax 74
64% 78.9 fps
MRender 78.5
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 65.9
59% 72.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303226
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1259 551 544 551 551 558 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 2,334
Mixed 1,500
SusWrite 669
337% 1,492 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 81.7
281% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 741
DQ Write 1,170
DQ Mixed 992
741% 968 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 229%
Great: 266%
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
353GB free
Firmware: 411040WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 450 452 452 452 452 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 447
Mixed 245
SusWrite 451
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 39.1
155% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 162
133% 190 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$40
826GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 178 180 179 178 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 219
Write 162
Mixed 115
SusWrite 179
124% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 114%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59
154GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 88 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 82
Write 76.2
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 87.5
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$59
93GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 90 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 108
Write 83.2
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 92.9
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
479GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 166 167 167 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 142
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 166
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 37.7
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.4
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,800
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback