ECS P43T-A2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardECS P43T-A2  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '17 at 16:42
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5440
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 45.8
2-Core 93.8
48% 74 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 190
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2871) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 32
21% 27.5 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 26.1
24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
71GB free
Firmware: HH100-08 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 55.3
Write 37.1
Mixed 22.8
28% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.25
60% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 36%
Seagate ST3250820A 250GB-$50
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAF Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 52.8
Write 51.9
Mixed 33.2
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P43T-A2 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS P43T-A2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback