Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '20 at 08:31
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 190
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 378
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Nvidia(10DE 1139) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 30.1
28% 32.9 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 32
Splatting 32.2
27% 33.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SVP100S296G 96GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CJR10202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 41 173 144 174 143 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 165
Write 181
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 119
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 23.4
72% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.2
DQ Write 58.5
DQ Mixed 26.9
24% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A00LF 99U5471-002.A00LF 9905471-001.A01LF 9905471-001.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback