Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z87X-UD5H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '20 at 04:22
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 223
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 583
59% 476 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2312) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.5% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 70.6
46% 63.7 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 52.7
45% 56 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 358 289 290 290 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 424
Write 409
Mixed 352
SusWrite 317
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 33.7
110% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 238
203% 300 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
48GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 65 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 63.8
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 65.6
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38%
Great: 55%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 158 181 180 182 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 115
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 171
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
3TB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 114 115 111 112 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 80.7
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 111
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 161 165 161 164 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 157
Mixed 87
SusWrite 162
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
310GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 122 122 125 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 119
Write 54.4
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 123
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 BL51264BA1339.16FD 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 BL51264BA1339.16FD 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.6
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback