Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '20 at 20:21
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 423
56% 422 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
Asus(1043 04E9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1090 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.7% Good
Lighting 80.4
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 104
66% 83.3 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 82.1
60% 72.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 456 463 467 299 208 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 468
Mixed 447
SusWrite 387
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 57.3
197% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 276
230% 333 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 122%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 192 192 194 191 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 176
Mixed 119
SusWrite 192
130% 176 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 118%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1648 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.8% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.9
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback