Asus G752VY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G752VY  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G752VY
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151105
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateMar 02 '17 at 02:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 196
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 548
55% 450 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M
Asus(1043 1CED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.9
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
43% Average
Lighting 52.8
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 49
43% 51.9 fps
MRender 56.8
Gravity 51
Splatting 50.9
43% 52.9 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLV128 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 859
Write 156
Mixed 243
90% 420 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 15.2
136% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 39.7
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 15.2
36% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 311%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
877GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 139
Write 131
Mixed 124
99% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.18
72% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G752VY Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus G752VY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $31
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback