Lenovo 81VU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81VU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '20 at 13:42
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5030
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 116
47% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 222
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Lighting 3.03
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 2.91
2% 3.08 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.93
Splatting 4
3% 3.34 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ128MEE1MWX 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0C0628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 198 196 174 170 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,318
Write 550
Mixed 635
SusWrite 193
148% 674 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 55.6
187% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 427
DQ Mixed 263
239% 363 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 141%
Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81VU Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81VU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback