Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FLC_X512FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FLC_X512FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FLC
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190830
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJun 22 '20 at 09:32
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 69%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 53.6
37% 50.6 Pts
4-Core 98.9
8-Core 146
15% 122 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Asus(1043 15DF) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4145
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 17.2
17% 17.4 fps
MRender 16.6
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 18.7
15% 17.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 250GB SSD 250GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 818 873 951 828 717 648 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1378
Write 226
Mixed 897
SusWrite 806
183% 827 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 31
128% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 233
177% 240 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 154%
Great: 209%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
371GB free
Firmware: JU0C1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 106 107 109 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 132
Write 134
Mixed 54
SusWrite 106
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
240% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 04CD F4-2666C19-8GRS 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 21.7
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FLC_X512FL Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FLC_X512FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback