Asrock X370 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180124
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '20 at 01:48
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 71.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 202 70% 126 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 636 62% 507 Pts	64-Core 822 51% 822 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.6% Above average	Lighting 67.4 Reflection 67.7 Parallax 58.3 55% 64.5 fps	MRender 63.2 Gravity 62.1 Splatting 62 51% 62.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,729 Write 702 Mixed 1,238 269% 1,223 MB/s	4K Read 54.2 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 68.4 229% 78.3 MB/s	DQ Read 830 DQ Write 607 DQ Mixed 776 564% 738 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 58GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 99 101 101 101 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 210 Write 169 Mixed 102 SusWrite 98 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 109%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$33 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 04.05G05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 105 105 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 108 Write 103 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 104 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 200% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FAD1 1x8GB 1,337 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	39.6% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 13 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 97.5 41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	45x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	26x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	23x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	7x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16