Dell XPS 8930

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 8930  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0T2HR0
Memory40.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 22 '20 at 00:02
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 152
2-Core 308
100% 184 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 1,109
102% 856 Pts
64-Core 1,442
89% 1,442 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 102%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Lighting 73.2
Reflection 80
Parallax 68.1
60% 73.8 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 70
Splatting 75.9
60% 72.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1249 848 856 852 853 844 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,037
Write 2,213
Mixed 1,774
SusWrite 917
390% 1,735 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 74.4
266% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,073
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 970
724% 966 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 262%
Great: 297%
Adata SWORDFISH 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: S0725B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 624 157 151 154 153 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,632
Write 1,078
Mixed 929
SusWrite 233
214% 968 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 26.9
188% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 454
437% 680 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 169%
Great: 233%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
46GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 99 96 95 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 123
Write 118
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 97
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
908GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 102 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 97.5
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 101
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2666 2OZ 3248CB0110B4 DDR4 3200 2OZ 3600CB0110E4 DDR4 2666 2OZ 0000CB01 AO2P26KC8T1-BXGSHC 48GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 26.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 38.4
SC Mixed 28.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8930 Builds (Compare 6,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Dell XPS 8930

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback