| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock J4105M (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180103 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 20 '20 at 19:08 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J4105
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
38.9%
Below average
|
39% 66.6 Pts
|
24% 182 Pts
|
12% 186 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
60.2%
Good
|
57% 69.3 fps
|
67% 83.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 28 22 26 22 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
29% 137 MB/s
|
34% 9.4 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
212GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 127 134 136 133 137 MB/s
|
76.9%
Very good
|
73% 99 MB/s
|
142% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
178GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 MB/s
|
32.8%
Below average
|
48% 64.1 MB/s
|
173% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
22.6%
Poor
|
24% 8.3 GB/s
|
13% 4.6 GB/s
|
23% 175 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical J4105M Builds (Compare 22 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock J4105M
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples | 14x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 2x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $30 |