HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory17.1 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '20 at 15:49
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5560
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 149
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 464
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 75%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 200 217 215 208 210 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.3% Average
Read 205
Write 182
Mixed 138
SusWrite 211
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 17.1
63% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 172
136% 188 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-PB 58GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 19.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback