Lenovo 4157WDQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4157WDQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090917
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '20 at 14:00
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3580
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 84.3
2-Core 171
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 421
44% 356 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
HP(103C 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.58
Parallax 3.59
3% 4.05 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 2.83
3% 4.09 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 91 107 112 116 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 116
Write 120
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 107
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 16
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback