Foxconn A78AX 3 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardFoxconn A78AX 3 Series  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '20 at 02:05
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
Socket 938, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 89.8
47% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 245
26% 205 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.1% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 55.3
Parallax 52.1
37% 51.1 fps
MRender 57
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 47.2
40% 48.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 60GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 84 78 99 79 76 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 185
Write 96.7
Mixed 110
SusWrite 84.4
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 6.1
51% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 13.5
DQ Mixed 8.2
8% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
3GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 93
Write 78.5
Mixed 59
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5674EB0-YK0 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5674EB0-YK0 8GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78AX 3 Series Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A78AX 3 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback