Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190708
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '20 at 01:01
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 77.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 246
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 902
84% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,339
83% 1,339 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 81.1
56% 70.3 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 57.8
Splatting 78.7
55% 65.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 298 286 292 261 189 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 456
Mixed 414
SusWrite 279
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 50.9
169% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 208
153% 202 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 124%
MB2000GCWDA 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: HPGD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 42 43 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 156
Write 44
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 42.5
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
175% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 105%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 1TB
757GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 123 121 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 100
Write 118
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 124
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 63%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
219GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 37 39 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 36.3
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 37.9
47% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,037
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback