Aaeon BOXER-6841M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAaeon BOXER-6841M  (all builds)
MotherboardAAEON PBA-SKS04
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '20 at 10:33
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 185
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 450
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 25.20.100.6323
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.46% Terrible
Lighting 8.17
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 8.19
7% 9.39 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 16.2
9% 10.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.46%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aaeon EP-SS25-256AACS 256GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 276 279 279 232 280 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 456
Mixed 408
SusWrite 271
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 46.2
172% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 212
197% 304 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSH64V1H 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback