Asrock N68-GS3 UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS3 UCC  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '17 at 17:53
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 78.5
1-Core 47
2-Core 95.1
48% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 189
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
PNY(196E 0973) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 9.35
Parallax 11.8
8% 10.4 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 13.1
11% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
260GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 119
Write 98.7
Mixed 107
82% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.61
4K Mixed 0.36
142% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST330083 1AS 137GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.02 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.7% Below average
Read 62.1
Write 55.2
Mixed 56.2
44% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.31
73% 0.56 MB/s
IC35L060AVV207-0 34GB
8GB free
Firmware: V22OA63A Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 29.5
Mixed 29.7
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.22
63% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.8% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS3 UCC Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS3 UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback