ADD TO PC
BUILD

Mousecomputer MP-i1620

Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Mousecomputer MP-i1620 (all builds)
Motherboard	MouseComputer Z270-S01
Memory	54.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171127
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '20 at 08:36
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 90.7 1-Core 140 2-Core 264 92% 165 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 763 75% 612 Pts	64-Core 763 47% 763 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 160 Reflection 171 Parallax 173 130% 168 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 156 Splatting 113 103% 127 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90 2,663 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 250GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 27 127 128 102 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 130 Write 269 Mixed 300 SusWrite 95.6 45% 198 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 80.8 4K Mixed 20.6 99% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 97.8 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 29.2 72% 143 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 78%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 166 166 169 169 169 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 136 Mixed 86 SusWrite 166 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 101%
ELECOM MF-MSU3 16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 14GB free, PID 6015 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8.3 7.5 8.1 8.1 7.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 34.8 Write 10.8 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 7.8 19% 17 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.6 96% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 28%
BUFFALO External HDD 2TB 220 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 414GB free, PID 01ba Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 29 30 30 30 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 34.2 Write 26 Mixed 23 SusWrite 29.5 37% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston RB24D4U7D8MB-16 4x16GB 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.7% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 26.4 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 25.9 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback