HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory	2 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080409
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '20 at 02:15
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	66%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon Dual Core 5000B 530 User benchmarks, average bench 38% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 42.1 1-Core 37.7 2-Core 71 31% 50.3 Pts	4-Core 72.9 8-Core 74.3 10% 73.6 Pts	64-Core 75.5 5% 75.5 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3100 Graphics 1,215 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 3029) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.4% Terrible	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 0.77 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.45 fps	MRender 0.52 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.78 0% 0.56 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.4% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L2 128GB 1,698 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT04L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 110 150 155 153 153 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.1% Average	Read 188 Write 165 Mixed 174 SusWrite 143 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 26.3 85% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 30.1 DQ Write 69.5 DQ Mixed 39.6 33% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 107%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 508GB free Firmware: 03.00C09 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 94 96 95 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 56.1 Write 90.5 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 92.7 55% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37GB 3,950 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 4096, 33792 MB Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

CPU
Athlon Dual Core 5200BAMDBench 38%, 321 samples	8x
Athlon Dual Core 5000BAMDBench 38%, 530 samples	6x
Athlon Dual Core 4450BAMD $21Bench 35%, 535 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon 3100 GraphicsATIBench 0%, 1,215 samples	19x
HD 5870AMDBench 19%, 10,176 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
35GBUnknownBench 13%, 2,113 samples	10x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	6x
39GBUnknownBench 18%, 2,202 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16