Asus P5KPL/EPU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5KPL/EPU (all builds)
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '20 at 01:26
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	55%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Memory 44.5 1-Core 24.2 2-Core 54 26% 40.9 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 106 14% 105 Pts	64-Core 109 7% 109 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6162) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (97^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (69 fps cap detected)	55.5% Above average	Lighting 67.8 Reflection 68.7 Parallax 65.9 55% 67.5 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 68.2 Splatting 67.7 56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB 11,393 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 210GB free (System drive) Firmware: FH100-06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 33 36 52 65 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 74.8 Write 49.2 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 45.9 38% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 56%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB 2,997 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 10GB free, PID 558a, Sandisk Ultra 16Gb Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 15 8.7 8.6 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	8.83% Terrible	Read 24.6 Write 12.2 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 11.9 21% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.8 93% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.83% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KPL/EPU Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL/EPU

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	6x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	5x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	4x
GeForce GT 520NvidiaBench 2%, 16,336 samples	3x

SSD
840 250GBSamsung $251Bench 70%, 41,998 samples	2x
Force 3 120GBCorsair $109Bench 48%, 22,358 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	25x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	7x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $360

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16