Acer Veriton X490G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton X490G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton X490G
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100810
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 23:34
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 46.5
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 152
52% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 210
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
HP(103C 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.98
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 10
Parallax 8.75
9% 10.1 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 9.47
Splatting 14
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 210 220 228 231 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.8% Above average
Read 245
Write 232
Mixed 206
SusWrite 216
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 25.5
91% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 178
139% 191 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA160B.C16F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 14.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton X490G Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton X490G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback