Lenovo 4223AL3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4223AL3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170327
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 22:30
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 128
56% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 388
39% 318 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 8501) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 6.85
Parallax 7.69
5% 6.88 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 7.17
5% 6.18 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 331 302 299 302 301 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 466
Mixed 454
SusWrite 315
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 40.2
134% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
266% 353 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96%
Great: 129%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
536GB free
Firmware: 6A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 171 171 173 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 171
Mixed 118
SusWrite 172
115% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.6
326% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M392B2G70BM0- 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.6
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4223AL3 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

System: Lenovo 4223AL3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback