Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% ¯¯¯¯¯¯SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Memory 46.2 1-Core 23.7 2-Core 47.3 26% 39.1 Pts	4-Core 78 8-Core 94 11% 86 Pts	64-Core 93.1 6% 93.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 22B1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 3.41 2% 2.61 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 2.57 Splatting 2.57 2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon LJH-128V2G 128GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: FJ70106 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 139 120 134 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 447 Write 144 Mixed 194 SusWrite 134 50% 230 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 21.8 74% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 145 112% 155 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 1x4GB 1,138 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 5.8 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	494x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	483x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	463x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,371x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	491x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	356x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16