Emachines eM350

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive15.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmachines eM350  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer eM350
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '20 at 02:42
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N450
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Memory 32.3
1-Core 4.9
2-Core 5.6
12% 14.3 Pts
4-Core 8.5
8-Core 8.5
1% 8.5 Pts
64-Core 8.7
0% 8.7 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 70 63 59 93 97 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.7% Very poor
Read 124
Write 73.5
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 76.8
19% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 6.1
19% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4E5432475436345538484430424E2D414420 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
7.77% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.7 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0.5
3% 0.93 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.77%
Great: 9%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback