Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0M1GJ6
Memory91.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 22:19
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 178
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 697
62% 525 Pts
64-Core 1,042
64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB
CLim: 742 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 28.7
20% 30.8 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 26.3
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 213 213 213 213 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.4% Good
Read 250
Write 232
Mixed 229
SusWrite 213
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 36.2
108% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 166
129% 175 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 125%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
114GB free
Firmware: 4V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 96 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 99.8
Mixed 71
SusWrite 95.8
67% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.3
230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3400820AS 400GB
259GB free
Firmware: L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 70.8
Write 71.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 71.1
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 500GB
295GB free, PID b202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 98 98 98 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.2% Below average
Read 98.8
Write 96
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 97.9
109% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 39%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB
8TB free, PID ab38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 172 172 172 172 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 190
Write 185
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 172
211% 159 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x16GB
6 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 26.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback