HP Z240 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z240 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802E
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160826
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 18:36
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 214
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 607
61% 497 Pts
64-Core 597
37% 597 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake)
HP(103C 802E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4811
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Lighting 7.23
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 7
6% 8.15 fps
MRender 8.95
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 14.8
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW74H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1186 1205 1206 1211 873 788 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,499
Write 1,226
Mixed 815
SusWrite 1,078
258% 1,154 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 57.7
209% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,128
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 434
403% 644 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 223%
Great: 237%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
396GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 440 437 450 455 360 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 449
Mixed 401
SusWrite 428
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 60.6
204% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 323
243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.9% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 18.4
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z240 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 936 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback