Huananzhi X79

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Huananzhi X79 (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180906
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '20 at 18:26
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 120 57% 90.9 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 361 34% 282 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3718) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.3% Above average	Lighting 66.5 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 59.9 54% 65 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 65.5 Splatting 66.1 54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50 78,255 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 33 44 53 54 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 1208 Write 923 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 60.7 121% 555 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 15 4K Mixed 16.3 74% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 14.6 DQ Mixed 30.1 50% 104 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 242%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 448GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 174 173 174 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 161 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 174 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GB 393 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 29.4 86% 30.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 9.2 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 675 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	124x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	67x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	42x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	39x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
AS2280P4 256GBApacerBench 168%, 1,607 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	57x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	46x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16