MSI MS-1773

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GS70 2QE
MotherboardMSI MS-1773  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 12:54
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 377
38% 305 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1103) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 41.5
Parallax 7.16
3% 17.6 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.09
5% 6.52 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,047
Write 680
Mixed 501
164% 743 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 24.1
73% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 138
114% 169 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 237%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
42GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 119 122 124 123 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 92
Write 90
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 120
59% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
37GB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 36
Mixed 32
SusWrite 14.4
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 104%
General UDisk 16GB
10GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.6 3.7 5.1 5.1 5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 14
Write 9.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.2
10% 8 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
6GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 37
Write 35.5
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 13.4
36% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KBG/8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.9% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1773 Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1773

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback