Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 07:40
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 98
2-Core 190
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 356
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.1017.1011
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Lighting 63
Reflection 63.5
Parallax 87.9
51% 71.5 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 53.7
49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PH6-CE120-G 120GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F/W:1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 58 39 89 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.5% Below average
Read 146
Write 158
Mixed 156
SusWrite 85.5
31% 136 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 21.1
80% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 57.3
DQ Mixed 31.2
26% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX R2.0 Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback