MSI A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7895
MotherboardMSI A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895)  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150511
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 12:33
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 41.8
2-Core 49.1
40% 55.3 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 108
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 79.8
5% 79.8 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 42.8
24% 33.9 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 34.3
27% 32.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 302
Write 270
Mixed 216
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 1.6
58% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 41.1
DQ Mixed 27.2
35% 66.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 87%
WD WD1200JS-00MHB0 120GB
16GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 39.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 41.6
28% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G RMR5040ED58E9W1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 7.2
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 5.4
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895) Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-P33 V2 (MS-7895)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback