AMI Intel

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAMI Intel  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Intel
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 09:24
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 42.5
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 104
38% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 206
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.28
2% 2.72 fps
MRender 4.33
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 6.3
4% 4.35 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD128GBS800 128GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0413A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 347 340 347 342 336 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 417
Write 331
Mixed 344
SusWrite 342
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 21.5
100% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 34.6
80% 161 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AMI Intel

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback