Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 23:20
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 64.4
2-Core 117
55% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 250
29% 223 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Gigabyte(1458 2271) 2GB
CLim: 1188 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 37.9
0% 23.4 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 27.4
Splatting 33.8
25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 8.49%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZH100-41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 36 36 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 53
Write 60.2
Mixed 39
SusWrite 36.1
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 32%
WD WD800JB-00JJC0 80GB
74GB free
Firmware: 05.01C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 55
Write 54.8
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 55.9
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 31%
TrekStor DS pocket g.u 250GB
194GB free, PID 0017
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 33 34 33 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 32
Write 37.2
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 33.7
44% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 19%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
245GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 122 122 121 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 112
Write 85.7
Mixed 63
SusWrite 120
127% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 GR1333D364L9/4G000 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 10.6
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback