HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8478
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 15:06
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 218
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 548
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 617 428 424 423 398 372 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 935
Write 1,033
Mixed 931
SusWrite 443
188% 836 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 71.2
224% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,006
DQ Write 1,088
DQ Mixed 1,120
823% 1,071 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 181%
Great: 302%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
628GB free
Firmware: JU004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 124 125 122 122 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 140
Write 115
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 123
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
221% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-043.A00G Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.7% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.6
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 17.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx Builds (Compare 4,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback