Acer Aspire 5315

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 5315  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Acadia
Memory1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 13:32
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7500-$90
uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 35.6
33% 43.4 Pts
4-Core 46.5
8-Core 49.6
6% 48 Pts
64-Core 50.1
3% 50.1 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 0136)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.17 fps
Splatting 0.17
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 151 44 60 34 4 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 219
Write 181
Mixed 188
SusWrite 49.2
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 14.7
63% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21.7
DQ Write 66.2
DQ Mixed 19.3
22% 35.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5315 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5315

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback