Toshiba Qosmio X305

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Toshiba Qosmio X305 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA KSRAA
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090310
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '20 at 13:26
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme Q9300-$219 660 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	48.3% Average	Memory 72.8 1-Core 38.4 2-Core 75.6 42% 62.3 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 144 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 146 9% 146 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTX 100 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Toshiba(1179 FF01) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 327.02 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 7.08 Parallax 2.34 1% 3.57 fps	MRender 5.29 Gravity 5.47 Splatting 4.7 4% 5.15 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Disk drive 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 329GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR021 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 175 23 226 227 222 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.4% Average	Read 244 Write 186 Mixed 208 SusWrite 170 45% 202 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 22.2 71% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 164 122% 160 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.8% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.7 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X305 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X305

CPU
Core2 Duo P7350Intel $43Bench 35%, 2,717 samples	4x
Core2 Extreme Q9300Intel $219Bench 46%, 660 samples	2x
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9700M GTSNvidiaBench 3%, 174 samples	4x
GeForce 9800M GTXNvidiaBench 6%, 100 samples	2x
GeForce 9800M GTSNvidiaBench 4%, 353 samples	2x

SSD
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $130Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x
Fury 240GBHyperX $65Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	1x
60G 60GBTxruiBench 44%, 17 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $173

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16