Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '20 at 06:59
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 254
81% 151 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 862
80% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,284
79% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.4% Very good
Lighting 92.4
Reflection 83.7
Parallax 72.9
75% 83 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 76.1
Splatting 75.7
61% 74.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 423
Mixed 28.8
70% 318 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 0.4
25% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
172GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 118 112 114 112 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 504
Write 475
Mixed 395
SusWrite 130
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 35.5
126% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 191
185% 292 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 83%
Maxtor 6V200E0 204GB
90GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 60.7
Mixed 40
SusWrite 54.7
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.4
132% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31%
Great: 37%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
313GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 77
Write 65.7
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 74.5
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
217GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 104 103 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 92.5
Write 93.2
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 104
108% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 43%
WD i HDS72 External 1TB
69GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 39
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 39.2
52% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 20%
WD Elements 500GB
449GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 107
129% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-2400C15-16GVR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 26.7
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 24.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $645
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback