Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70 23,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	37% Below average	Memory 60.3 1-Core 28.2 2-Core 53.8 33% 47.4 Pts	4-Core 81.8 8-Core 83.5 11% 82.7 Pts	64-Core 90.2 6% 90.2 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 905A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.86% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.94 1% 1 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.25 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.86% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE512HMHP-00004 512GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 388GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0300Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 104 105 160 170 201 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.1% Below average	Read 171 Write 99.8 Mixed 111 SusWrite 149 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 12.6 44% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 74.1 77% 126 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 100%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 128GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 31GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 102 93 106 128 101 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 117 Write 156 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 110 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 2.5 484% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 213%
Ricoh SD/MMC Disk Device 129GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 21GB free Firmware: 02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 13 10 19 13 18 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	9.67% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 9.2 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 13.5 10% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.8 259% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.67% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 8.1 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 5.2 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM