Dell Precision M6700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Precision M6700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0JWMFY
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121008
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 08:39
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 118
56% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 352
34% 281 Pts
64-Core 363
22% 363 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 053F) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.1% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 3.12
4% 4.16 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 8.61
5% 5.78 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.1%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 600GB-$350
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 101 104 98 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 244
Write 77.7
Mixed 142
SusWrite 102
31% 141 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 20.9
65% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 64.5
DQ Mixed 68.4
58% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 55%
Apple HDD HTS547575A9E38 750GB
201GB free
Firmware: JE4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 64.3
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 63.4
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 50%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
545GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 17
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 17.1
23% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 45%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
879GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 15 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.51% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 17.3
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 15.7
24% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M6700 Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback