MSI MS-7309

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardMSI MS-7309  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20070522
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '20 at 01:31
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 2.4
2-Core 19.3
24% 28.1 Pts
4-Core 16.6
8-Core 15.8
2% 16.2 Pts
64-Core 14.6
1% 14.6 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200
Sapphire(174B A004) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1003
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.23
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.91
2% 1.76 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 39 42 50 51 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.7% Very poor
Read 63
Write 46.7
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 46.7
11% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 8.6
19% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
218GB free
Firmware: AV0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 62 87 87 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 64.5
Write 55
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 83
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.63% Terrible
MC Read 1.5
MC Write 1.2
MC Mixed 1.8
4% 1.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1.4
5% 1.6 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 6.63%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7309 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-7309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback