Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '20 at 23:21
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 160
2-Core 316
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 1,003
100% 813 Pts
64-Core 1,311
81% 1,311 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 106%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 148
Parallax 158
128% 154 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 129
Splatting 104
110% 139 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 93 96 93 91 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 224
Write 124
Mixed 178
SusWrite 94.5
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 22.2
116% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 92.8
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 96.9
77% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54%
Great: 73%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
229GB free
Firmware: P1225C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 371 381 383 382 387 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 461
Write 380
Mixed 290
SusWrite 380
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 26.1
109% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 192
160% 226 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 105%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
218GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 139 151 151 151 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 152
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 148
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 103%
Generic USB SD Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 0330
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.7 5.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 4.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.8
9% 8.52 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 8%
Garmin GARMIN Flash 8GB
2GB free, PID 272c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
9.4% Terrible
Read 3.2
Write 3.7
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 0.1
4% 2.62 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.6
190% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.4%
Great: 11%
Garmin GARMIN Card 16GB
9GB free, PID 272c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0.9 1 1 1 1.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Read 2.2
Write 1
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 1
2% 1.48 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.4
75% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 30.4
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 46.5
SC Mixed 32.3
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 53.4
75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,254
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback