Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-5757M APU 1,325 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Memory 79.1 1-Core 61.1 2-Core 102 52% 80.9 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 144 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G 4,043 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 080F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	4.88% Terrible	Lighting 5.97 Reflection 7.42 Parallax 5.69 5% 6.36 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 5.03 Splatting 7.48 5% 5.79 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.88% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
D2RSTK251E19-0400 400GB 198 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 344GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.20E SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 173 181 183 184 191 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 352 Write 202 Mixed 248 SusWrite 178 55% 245 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 14.3 56% 15.7 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 89.4 DQ Mixed 120 99% 146 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 8GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	33% Below average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 11.5 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 10.7 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
A10-5757M APUAMDBench 44%, 1,325 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 8650GAMDBench 5%, 4,043 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 8GBUnknownBench 27%, 586 samples	1x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 12GBSamsungBench 30%, 6 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16