Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A89TD PRO USB3  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '20 at 20:47
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 110
54% 84 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 326
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 98 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 124
Write 117
Mixed 125
SusWrite 97.5
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 18.8
98% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 85.7
DQ Mixed 31
30% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 61%
Asus RAIDR Express PCIe
223GB free
Firmware: MV.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 331 349 346 358 353 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 443
Write 413
Mixed 329
SusWrite 348
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 34.7
116% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 96.5
123% 218 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 320GB-$36
8GB free
Firmware: V54OA73A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 18 16 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 17
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 16.8
12% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1866C9D 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89TD PRO USB3 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback