MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '20 at 20:33
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 606
54% 455 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.2% Good
Lighting 89.1
Reflection 81
Parallax 71.5
73% 80.5 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 74.6
60% 72.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 304 300 295 306 297 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 310
Mixed 277
SusWrite 310
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 36.7
142% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 239
208% 310 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
134GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 105 106 107 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70% Very good
Read 138
Write 104
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 106
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 32
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 27.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 1,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback