Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 152 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 354 40% 312 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Galax TA 1D0120A 120GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 40GB free Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 84 102 63 64 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 287 Write 278 Mixed 229 SusWrite 92.1 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 84.1 4K Mixed 29.4 126% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 151 135% 203 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 75%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 70 69 71 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 75.3 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 69.3 49% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 59%
Hua72202 0ALA330 2TB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 39 38 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 117 Write 38.5 Mixed 41.3 SusWrite 38.2 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 120% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB 449 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 933, 933, 933 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	46.5% Average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 15.7 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 12.2 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	141x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	48x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	35x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $289