Asus K53SC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K53SC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SC
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '17 at 22:45
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 139
60% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 350
38% 299 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 1682) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2291
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.24 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.83
2% 2.64 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9640423AS 640GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 80.8
Write 81.1
Mixed 74.7
59% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.19
49% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 029E CM3X4GSD1066 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SC Builds (Compare 286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback