| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141204 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 25 '17 at 22:38 |
| Run Duration | 107 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
69.9%
Good
|
78% 135 Pts
|
38% 285 Pts
|
18% 283 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66
|
32.2%
Below average
|
33% 36.4 fps
|
31% 37.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
74.6%
Very good
|
85% 383 MB/s
|
88% 33.4 MB/s
|
91% 184 MB/s
|
|
|
99.8%
Outstanding
|
132% 174 MB/s
|
90% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
33.1%
Below average
|
30% 10.3 GB/s
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
61% 66 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 532 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 217x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 131x |
| Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples | 72x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples | 59x |
| GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples | 46x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 45x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $222 |