| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock N68C-GS4 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160216 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 12 '20 at 14:24 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | BGR-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
44.4%
Average
|
49% 78.4 Pts
|
14% 124 Pts
|
15% 239 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Palit(1569 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
18% 24 fps
|
22% 27.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
703GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 124 168 180 182 173 MB/s
|
73.9%
Very good
|
77% 105 MB/s
|
174% 1.17 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1TB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 168 171 172 171 MB/s
|
102%
Outstanding
|
105% 144 MB/s
|
162% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1638 MHz
|
20.3%
Poor
|
19% 6.7 GB/s
|
12% 4.1 GB/s
|
44% 91.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68C-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 92 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS4 FX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 39x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 8x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 11x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $106 |